For compliance teams pursuing an AI strategy

Audit-native controls

Compliance controls that record evidence as they run, with full context. Every decision is captured, attributable and immutable. The chain of custody is ready when the auditor asks.

Findingb7e0d34Jun 12, 2026, 6:53 PM UTC9/10
Finding218af6cJun 11, 2026, 6:54 PM UTC9/10
Finding90c3e5bJun 10, 2026, 6:54 PM UTC9/10
Finding4f9c2a1Jun 13, 2026, 6:54 PM UTC7/10
“Trusted by 9 of the 10 largest U.S. carriers” anchors the Q2 brokerage campaign.

Substantiation. Signed-carrier records back the count, and the line reads as reputational standing, not a performance promise. Evidence. Two of the nine are month-to-month carriers up for renewal within 60 days, so the “9 of 10” rests on a thinner base than it looks. Exposure. Pinned to a fixed number, the claim turns unsupported the moment one of those relationships lapses.

FTC Act §5 · Advertising Substantiation · Advertising Review Policy §4.2
Bind the claim to a live carrier count and re-substantiate on any roster change.
Decision context: e7a13f0
problem

The audit-vs-automation gap

For regulated firms, automation and audit defensibility are at odds. Tools can save time but reconstruct the audit trail after the fact. Manual review is defensible but doesn't scale. Firms with needs beyond standard frameworks have nowhere to turn.

01

Manual evidence assembly

Preparing for an audit takes an enormous amount of manual work. Traces are pulled from disparate systems, connected back to control objectives by hand and compiled into evidence packets.

02

Off-the-shelf tools don't fit your controls

Generic compliance tools cover standard frameworks but can't serve firm-specific needs well, and the evidence they produce still gets assembled after the fact.

03

AI strategies add a new governance burden

Your own AI workflows generate consequential decisions that now need to be controlled and evidenced, on top of every existing control.

How it's different

Audit-native compliance controls

From manual evidence assembly to audit-by-query.

Evidence as a byproduct

Each control operation produces a finding, backed by an evidence record written as it runs: control version, policy clause, input, decision, actor, model version, timestamp, rationale. That record is attributable and immutable, built into the type of object the system produces. No reconstruction.

Custom controls without custom audit plumbing

Author firm-specific controls from your proprietary context: internal guidelines, scorecards or jurisdiction-specific overrides. Get the audit trail for free. Bespoke rules and audit defensibility stop being a tradeoff.

Composes with your AI

Your AI agents and workflows plug in directly. Read decision traces to ground your AI's work, or run AI actions through controls to make them audit-native too. No model lock-in.

Architecture

How a control is built and run

You build your own controls and keep them current as the rules change, with every change reviewed and versioned. When a control runs, it runs in the write path, so the full context of each decision is captured the moment it happens, never reconstructed from logs after the fact. The record is immutable and append-only, and when the auditor asks, the answer is a query.

DESIGN LAYER Create your own, bespoke controls Revise based on regulatory or internal changes Change is governed CONTROL Design is versioned OPERATING LAYER Execute in the write path, not observed after Store immutable and append-only Audit is a query

See it in action

What you get

Everything your control program needs

Custom-control authoring

Compose firm-specific controls from your proprietary context, without forcing them into a standard framework.

Scored findings and guidance

Every control operation produces a finding scored for risk, with remediation guidance the team can act on.

Atomic, queryable evidence

Every firing writes a tamper-evident, attributed record to an immutable store. Pull audit-ready packets on demand, with scoped access for auditors and regulators.

MCP read for your AI

Your AI workflows query the decision trace through a stable, versioned, permissioned interface. No model lock-in.

MCP write for AI governance

AI actions flow through controls before they commit, so they become controlled, evidenced activities with the same trace schema as every other control.

Governed change workflow

Policy updates, regulation changes and control revisions flow through propose → review → approve → version. No silent drift.

Why this approach

A durable foundation

Architecture, not posture

Audit-readiness is a property of how the system operates, not a quarterly project. Audit-native is not a slogan. It is built in.

Horizontal across regulated industries

One platform covers marketing claims, AML triage, best-interest reviews, communications supervision and AI fair-lending, plus any firm-specific control you run.

Built for your AI strategy

Your AI plugs in. Lunar Aspect complements your AI strategy rather than boxing it in. The platform appreciates with frontier progress, not against it.

Architecture, not posture

Audit-readiness is a property of how the system operates, not a quarterly project. Audit-native is not a slogan. It is built in.

Horizontal across regulated industries

One platform covers marketing claims, AML triage, best-interest reviews, communications supervision and AI fair-lending, plus any firm-specific control you run.

Built for your AI strategy

Your AI plugs in. Lunar Aspect complements your AI strategy rather than boxing it in. The platform appreciates with frontier progress, not against it.

See Lunar Aspect in action

See Lunar Aspect in action

Book a 30-minute technical walkthrough. We'll show you the architecture and walk the chain of custody end-to-end against a control of your choosing.

Book a 30-minute technical walkthrough. We'll show you the architecture and walk the chain of custody end-to-end against a control of your choosing.